Information Technology Writeups: The Main Difference Among Citrix Xenserver 5.6.1, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V R2, Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 2.2 & Vmware vSphere 4.1

Friday 9 December 2011

The Main Difference Among Citrix Xenserver 5.6.1, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V R2, Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 2.2 & Vmware vSphere 4.1

Virtualization is now considered as viable for financial gatherings of all sizes.

VMware advances the market by a long shot but there are a number of vendors to decide from.

We have weighed against the primary virtualization vendors in the matrix below

Overall, VMware advances the gathering of vendors, which embraced Citrix Xen Server; Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V R2; Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 2.2 and VMware VSphere.

But the gap is finishing fast. All are viable in a goods produced environment. The greatest of financial gatherings still observe virtualization as the best pick but tiny and mid-sized financial gatherings have picks to decide from as observed in this aspect visual show clearly below

Virtualization Server Comparison
Features	Citrix	Microsoft	Red Hat	Vmware
	Xenserver	Windows	Enterprise	vSphere
	5.6.1	Server 2008	Virtualization	4.1
		Hyper-V R2	2.2
vCPUs per host	512	512	512	512
vCPUs per VM	8 Win /32 Linux	4	8	16

RAM per host	512 GB	1 TB	1 TB	1 TB
RAM per VM	32 GB	64 GB	256 GB	255 GB
Page sharing	No	No	Yes	Yes
Virtual NICs	7 / guest	8 synthetic, 4 emulated	8 / guest	10 / guest

VLAN Supports	Yes	Yes (but with separate guest config.	Yes	Yes


Guest OS Support	CentOS, Debian, Redhat, Suse, Windows	Red Hat, Suse, Windows	Red Hat, windows	Most x86 OS

Live Migrations	Yes	Yes ( requires windows clustering	Yes	Yes


Live Storage Migrations	No	No (but can automate with VM suspend)	No	Yes


High availability	Yes	Yes	Yes (but not for	Yes

Microsoft is VMware's adjacent contestant as it can be supposed in the comparison.

Among the three challengers, Microsoft Hyper-V comes adjacent to VMware vSphere in overall authorities functionality. However, though VMware, Red Hat, and Citrix merge virtualization host and VM authorities in a single authorities attendant, Microsoft spreads the runs across multiple System Center tools. Hyper-V's drew near competency come at the charge of other atop, configuration, and complexity for administrators.

That terminal sentence sum totals higher the competitions to those account for virtualization. It's no longer the charge that ought save customers from supporting virtualization. Instead, it's the technical knowledge wanted that ought become one of the greatest considerations.

Note: The remaining features which are as under are available in all of the above VM servers.